The Forced Subjugation approach
This group claims to obtain superior results by making it impossible for the male to escape control and punishment. Proponents of this method usually advocate restricting the male’s movement during discipline to prevent him from struggling or escaping. They are in favor of using higher security chastity devices and sometimes use blackmailing to ensure compliance. They believe that it is natural for a male to initially struggle and try to resist control, but that once he understands there is no escape he will quickly lose any desire to resist (in animal training lingo, his resistance has become an “extinct” behavior due to its ineffectiveness). Some women who follow this method care little about how the male feels about his situation, and often even enjoy seeing their male’s internal resistance defeated (“breaking”). But a large majority of women who buy into this “forced subjugation” training philosophy are simply trying to take their male to the “breaking” point quickly and hoping he will soon come to accept his condition, enabling a milder (and less tiring) form of discipline down the road.
The Willful Participation approach
The second school of thought claims to obtain superior results by putting the male in a state in which he will offer voluntary compliance. This philosophy advocates the training of a male in his inner, mental world. It aims at persuading him to eventually relinquish his independence, in favor of a more fulfilling role in acceptance of female authority. This group claims that the quality of voluntary servitude is long-lasting and cannot be approached by coercive methods, and that it is a male’s self-image and value system that needs to be reframed before lasting change can be seen in his behavior. Proponents of this philosophy do not always refrain from coercion, especially in the beginning stages of training – however, they invariably single out the budding of a male’s voluntary compliance (“willful participation”) as the “breaking point” to achieve.
Different interpretations of male chastity
Any male training approach can much benefit from increased seminal volume, as this fluid is known to function as an intoxicant, overcoming his logic and greatly reducing his mental defenses, leaving ample opportunity for behavior modification. However, while the forced subjugation approach sees chastity as merely a way to keep the male frustrated and receptive, willful participation exploits increased levels of sexual desire in a male to reframe his sexual identity. Willful participation proponents emphasize the sexualization of obedience in a male’s mind, mirroring the all too infrequent ”spontaneous” subservience of naturally submissive males. Obedience and humiliation are sexualized through chastity and by association/anchoring until the male starts to see his own subjugation and self-sacrifice as the most appealing (or the only conceivable) form of sexual relief.
Criticism
Some opponents of the forced subjugation philosophy often refer to it as antiquate or barbaric. However, it is widely believed that only the lack of legal infrastructure has delayed its adoption. In a recently conducted poll, only 15% of women were in favor of a paramilitary “male police” enforcing pre-marital engagement contracts and wedding certificates with male ownership clauses (citizenship resignation, personhood renouncement, personal ownership affidavits). Likely, as feminist groups and female-owned corporations continue to lobby public opinion and policy will eventually change. A large number of women who currently practice the forced subjugation philosophy inside close doors are then expected to come out of the closet tilting the statistics.
Opponents of the “willful participation” philosophy often complain about inconsistent compliance and intermittent usefulness of males undergoing this type of training. However, DreamLover Labs products add to a regular willful participation regimen the many benefits of positive punishment and negative reinforcement and guarantee consistent obedience even at early training stages.
For the time being, the “willful participation” philosophy is poised to become a favorite among newly liberated women. If you are new to male training, unless you have a particularly stubborn male on your hands, you will find this approach a lot easier as it requires less supervision and monetary investment. For reasons of practicality and convenience, most school counselors recommend young girls to solve their boyfriend problems with the willful participation method, further accelerating its spread among young couples.
Source: Dream Lover Labs
